On spam and spammers

01/17/05

Permalink 11:23:54 am, by me, 222 words, 296 views   English (US)
Categories: Catch-All

On spam and spammers

Open question to the community: is there an effective, ethical, and legal way to prevent these people from doing what they do? If they aren't filling up my mail with C14L15 and V*I*A*G*R*A ads (more amusing was the one that promised that I could "Increase by one full cup size in two weeks - guaranteed!" to which my reply was "To hell with that - lots of pizza and beer would work fine on me and be a lot more fun than some stupid pill."), the spammers are screwing up my referrer stats, hijacking domain names - for example, one of the referrer spams I had was a soccer website registered in the dot-org namespace - or otherwise finding ways to piss off 99.8% of the population in the search of a fast buck.

I'm kind of wondering if there isn't a clear psychological profile developing of these people - "sociopath" comes to mind but I'm no shrink. Any shrinks out there are more than welcome to add their ideas, as well as lambasting me for using the term "shrink."

Anyhow, I guess the best solution to spammers is to wrap them in barbed wire and fire them into the Sun. Unfortunately, that's neither ethical nor legal, and hardly practical, so let's put our heads together to find a better solution, neh?

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: mistermocha [Member]
What, you don't want bigger breasts and an over-functioning unit? (hmm... sounds like the drug companies are working you towards screwing yourself)
PermalinkPermalink 01/18/05 @ 10:24
Comment from: cocoa [Member]
I registered just to reply to this. :)

There's a simple solution thought up many years ago (by whom, I don't know). The real problem is that currently you and I--the recepient--pay the cost of recieving unsolicited email. I mean, imagine if you paid to get junkmail in your inbox. Or if telemarketers could charge you for calling you. Then we'd have a lot more of that going on.

If people had to pay, say, 1 cent to send an email, that wouldn't break the average emailer's bank. It would, however, make spamming un economical. I mean, spammers work on percentages. By sending emails out to a few million people, they only need a few thousand fools to buy their product. Of course, the total cost of 1 cent per email would probably make that uneconomical (unless they had something really good to sell, in which cause most of us probably wouldn't mind receiving it).

As for the problem of legitimate mass emailers being costed out, you have two approaches. Things like not-for-profit organisations could make deals with ISPs (who would ultimately be the chargers). And solicited emailers could have some sort of charge transference thing, like how you pay postage if you want to recieve a magazine.
PermalinkPermalink 02/05/05 @ 19:14

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

Everything Else

Randomness, politics, fishing tips, who knows?

January 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Search

Categories

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 5

powered by b2evolution free blog software